Saturday, December 15, 2012

Reading Response to The Memory Keeper's Daughter by Kim Edwards

       The Memory Keeper's Daughter by Kim Edwards has a very interesting story line.  This book is very intriguing though a little difficult to relate to since the events that occur in it are so out of the ordinary.  In the story so far, the wife of a loving husband gave birth to twins.  She was expecting to give birth to her children with a doctor though when she went into labor the doctor had a car wreck trying to get to the hospital.  The husband, a orthopedic surgeon, was forced to deliver his babies.  There is a twist though.  They were only expecting one baby so when two came they were delighted.  The husband however saw that the little girl was not healthy and had a similar disease that his sister had died of.  He told his assistant to take the baby to a home for children with these problems.  He did not want to tell his wife of this decision so he told her that the girl had died and that they only had a little boy.
       As you can see, this story line is a little confusing and hard to follow.  There is not a lot to connect the reader to the book other than true curiosity.  I think the author could have done a little better job trying to give her audience something, even it is a small thing, to relate to.  A father hiding his daughter from the mother does not happen often, which is a good and bad thing for this book.  It doesn't happen often therefore it is interesting to read about, but hard to empathize with.  There is not a level of emotional attachment to the characters.  Other than the lack of relatable material this book is amazing.  I can't wait to find out what happens next.

4 comments:

  1. I agree with you, Abby. I think the author was thinking more about how to keep the reader interested,, rather than having a plausible storyline. I definitley agree with you that not many would be able to relate to this book, but what's surprising to me is that I'm interested anyway! Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I definitely can agree with you that there was nothing in that book that you can relate to. Exactly how Holly said I think the author just wrote this book to make it interesting. She probably didn't think about the reader relating to it. She probably wanted to draw the reader in with those details not to make them relate to the story. Anyway, I really liked your post and I might want to check out this book also!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you guys, but abby, you are absolutely right. Even giving the reader a liiiittle bit to hang on to would make for a more interesting book. I am definitely checking this book out... Sadia, you are probably right, it was to draw the reader in, and this is just the beginning of the book so you never know... labor you might find something

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah you guys are right, maybe it was to draw the reader in. Though I still felt as though the pace was really slow and yes that subject topic is interesting, but maybe I just didn't enjoy the book as much because it was also very sad.

    ReplyDelete