Reading Response to The Memory Keeper's Daughter by Kim Edwards

       The Memory Keeper's Daughter by Kim Edwards has a very interesting story line.  This book is very intriguing though a little difficult to relate to since the events that occur in it are so out of the ordinary.  In the story so far, the wife of a loving husband gave birth to twins.  She was expecting to give birth to her children with a doctor though when she went into labor the doctor had a car wreck trying to get to the hospital.  The husband, a orthopedic surgeon, was forced to deliver his babies.  There is a twist though.  They were only expecting one baby so when two came they were delighted.  The husband however saw that the little girl was not healthy and had a similar disease that his sister had died of.  He told his assistant to take the baby to a home for children with these problems.  He did not want to tell his wife of this decision so he told her that the girl had died and that they only had a little boy.
       As you can see, this story line is a little confusing and hard to follow.  There is not a lot to connect the reader to the book other than true curiosity.  I think the author could have done a little better job trying to give her audience something, even it is a small thing, to relate to.  A father hiding his daughter from the mother does not happen often, which is a good and bad thing for this book.  It doesn't happen often therefore it is interesting to read about, but hard to empathize with.  There is not a level of emotional attachment to the characters.  Other than the lack of relatable material this book is amazing.  I can't wait to find out what happens next.

Reading Response #2 to Sarah's Key by Tatiana de Rosnay

       I really enjoyed the perspective change that Tatiana de Rosnay used in this book, Sarah's Key.  She switched back and forth between a writer in Paris during the present time period, and a little girl in Paris during the Jewish roundup in 1492.  The characters' plot mountains are very similar.  They both had climaxes at the same time which made the story extremely exciting.  This book is dealing with many important issues that are still problems today.
       In the present time character's story, she was dealing with racism and abortion.  Although she had lived in Paris for 25 years, all of her friends and French family still referred to her as the American.  Whenever she did something wrong they would say something like, "You silly American."  This made her feel very excluded and bad about herself.  She just wanted to be seen as a true Parisian because that is how she saw herself.  She wanted to fit in so bad, but no one would include her in their definition of a true French woman.  This lady was also dealing with pregnancy issues.  Her husband was very selfish and wanted a baby so badly from his wife, preferably a son.  Though she had numerous and sometimes fatal difficulties.  She finally managed to give birth to a beautiful, healthy girl.  Though he soon begged her for a second child which she failed to deliver.  This woman could just not do it no matter how badly she wanted to.  Though she finally managed to get pregnant again, but this time he decided he was too old to have a baby and would divorce her if she did not get an abortion.  I think this must have crushed her.  All she wanted to do was to make her husband happy though she failed to do so.  This insight helped her decide that she needed to make herself happy for once so she decided to have the baby.  I think the author created this character and her problems to help make the story more relatable.
       The little girl from the 1940s had less relatable, but very devastating problems.  She was Jewish, during the Jewish roundup.  Things were not looking good for her and she had no idea what was going on because her parents thought they were protecting her by keeping information from her.  She decided to lock her brother in the cupboard to keep him safe because she thought that her family would return to their home in a few hours.  She had no idea what was going on.  In the next month she lost her entire family, her trust for adults and her innocence.  The girl went through a rapid character change, just like the present day woman.  I think the author had their story lines connect to reduce confusion about what was going on.  I truly loved this book, reading it was an incredibly emotional journey and I would recommend it to anyone who likes WWII books.

Reading Response for Sarah's Key

       In Sarah's Key by Tatiana de Rosnay, the main character, Sarah, goes through a lot of personality change, though she does keep some main character traits throughout the story.  In the beginning of the book, Sarah is selfless and just plain happy.  She doesn't understand what is going on around her.  Sarah lives in Paris, France during 1942, the time of the Jewish roundup.  Unfortunately, Sarah is Jewish.  Her parents have kept all the political information from her though, so when French police come pounding on their door in the middle of the night, she has no idea what is happening.  Though Sarah is very helpful and selfless.  She knew her father was hiding in the attic, but she didn't know why.  So she kind of took charge in this stressful moment.  Her mother was frozen with fear, so Sarah calmed her down.  She persuaded her to open the door and talk to the police.  The police then told them that they had to pack for a short trip.  Her four-year-old brother decided that he was going to protest this madness and not pack.  So Sarah did what she thought was best at the time.  She decided to lock him in a secret cupboard and release him as soon as they came back.  What she didn't know was that they were never coming back.

       Sarah then was transported to a massive stadium with her mother and father.  She was not her usual self, though I don't think anyone would be expected to act normal in such a terrible time.  She was very panicky and couldn't stop thinking about her brother locked in the cabinet.  She took full blame for him being trapped.  Though I do not think it is her fault.  If her parents had told her anything that was going on she would have known that they were not coming back.  I think that Sarah's parents made the mistake that keeping necessary information from her was protecting her, when really it was the opposite.

       Towards the end of the story Sarah has really gotten brave and hard.  She lost her entire family and has no idea where they are.  So she is on her own, left to fend for herself against abusive police and sick, dying children.  Though Sarah remains to have her selfless character.  She tells stories that she used to tell her brother to all of the smaller children to give them something to focus on other than the  horrifying things going on around them.  She also holds their hands when they are scared, which is a lot.  Though Sarah is so determined to escape.  She thinks that if she leaves the camp now that she will be able to save her brother.  So she and her friend, Rachel, sneak out of the camp through a little gap in the fence.  Now they are left to find there way and not get caught with only a small amount of money that one of the friendliest guards gave them.  Hopefully Sarah's many great character traits will help she and her friend survive.

Child Soldiers Argumentative Essay

            Child recruitment is a large and terrible problem that usually occurs in war-torn, unstable countries.  The recruiters especially like to take children that have recently lost their families and don’t know what to do with themselves.  “Child soldiers are ideal,” a military commander from Chad told Human Rights Watch.  “They don’t complain, they don’t expect to be paid--and if you tell them to kill, they kill.”  (“Armed and Underage” by Jeffrey Gettleman in Congo) Many of these children respect their troops as their family, and have a sense of loyalty to them.  I believe that child soldiers are victims.  For example, children in Sierra Leone went to a military base for help because they had lost their family and needed protection during the war.  Instead of getting help, they were forcefully recruited and given drugs so that they didn’t feel as bad when they killed people.  They were not themselves.

            The children were given no choice as whether to leave the army or to stay.  They didn’t know what to do, because if they left they would have been killed by rebels.  The only reason they stayed was to be safe.  Joining the army became a survival skill.  When they were actually killing people they weren’t themselves.  Officials had given them drugs and now they were addicted.  They couldn’t think and they lost themselves completely.  “This became our reality, we lost ourselves completely in this war…it becomes your life…” (CBS Eye-to-Eye Witness Interview with Ishmael Beah)  This shows that the children were not choosing to kill those people.  While drugged, they were worried about their new ‘family’.  They were manipulated into thinking that the generals had some sort of magical power that would keep them safe.  This belief caused the young confused children to give faith to the crazy recruiters; they were loyal because of fear of losing their lives.

            These children did not ask for this to happen to them.  They were taken away and forced to kill people in their own villages.  The only reason they took drugs, besides addiction, was to numb the pain of killing all these innocent people as well as the hate for what the government had done.  The children found difficulty in killing people at first.  “They trained us to fight,” a boy continues.  “The first time I killed someone I go so sick, I thought I was going to die.  But I got better…. My fighting name was Blood Never Dry.”  (“Children at War” by P.W. Singer)  Once humanities groups, like UNICEF, had rescued children they were taken to rehabilitation centers in stable countries.  It took years and years for these children to face the memories and quit the drugs.  Ishmael Beah tells a small anecdote in his CBS interview about how whenever he would turn on the tap water or shower, all he would see was blood coming out of the faucet.  It took a while, and he had to really stare at the liquid to realize it was just water.  He had terrible nightmares about combat.  This unfair fighting has taken away so much of these children’s lives.  And it is not only boys.  Girls are usually made as servants and cooks and are subject to sexual abuse, including rape.

            The other side states that child soldiers are perpetrators.  They might say that even though these children were forcefully recruited, they chose to stay and fight with that army.  They chose to, “burn down huts and pound newborn babies to death.” (“Armed and Underage” by Jeffrey Gettleman in Congo)  Though if they had left, rebel groups would have killed them.  Should a child really have to make the decision to give up their life so others can live?  That is a terrible way to grow up, and a very difficult decision.  Only someone in their right mind would even be able to think about doing something that selfless, and these kids weren’t in their right mind.  They were extremely heavily drugged.  The only thing they could think about was killing the enemy and not being killed.  There was no room in their minds for leaving their ‘family’, who had so far protected them like they promised they would.

            In many unstable countries, young people in unfortunate situations are manipulated into joining armies when war breaks out.  They stay with the army because it is the only support they have.  These children do no want to kill people, so therefore they are not perpetrators.  They are forced and tricked into obeying commands.  When considering the facts, child soldiers can only be seen as victims.

Reading Response to The Book Thief by Markus Zusak

       The Book Thief by Markus Zusak uses very creative writing skills to display the life of a little girl during World War II.  The author describes everything with great detail and gives little snippets of translation or observations throughout the story.  This book has a lot of unhappiness and tragedy, as do most stories from this time period.  The little girl starts off as already being extremely cautious and she sleeps with one eye open.  She and her family are aboard a train and she is looking after herself and her family.  Something wakes her up and she crawls over to find her brother.  She finds him dead.  This tragedy has her distraught and panicked.  She lets her guard down, which is a rare thing.  The disbelief is fresh in her mind.

       Then she wakes her mom with a frightened shake.  Her mother learns of the boy's death and becomes as doubtful as the little girl is.  They shake the boy, willing him to wake up.  But he doesn't.  They tell the train officials and then are directed to get off the train.  The little girl's character has already changed, even this early in the story.  She went from a girl keeping an eye on her family and having everything under control to a girl who has just loss her brother and can't believe it.  She doesn't care about taking care of her family anymore because she has already failed.  Though this is not the girl's fault, she takes blame for it, as would anyone.  They buried the boy in a cold, graveyard with the company only of a priest and two gravediggers.  On the way out of the cemetery the girl finds a book that one of the gravediggers, the apprentice, has dropped.  She picks it up and takes it with her.  This is how she began to get her name as the Book Thief.  She misses her brother more than anything in the world, and all she needs is a stable, loving mother.
       Although her mother wants to be there for her daughter, she cannot provide enough for her at this terrible time.  Their mother intended to take both of them to the foster home, but unfortunately the little girl's brother did not survive the trip.  Now the girl did not have a companion to help get through this tough experience with.  She was all by herself.  It took her 15 minutes to be coaxed out of the car once she arrived at her foster house.  Though I think she has a special connection with the 'father' who smokes a lot of cigars because he is the one who got her to come out.  When she did enter the house she was holding his hand and her small suitcase with the gravedigger's book inside.

Reading Response to Berlin Boxing Club by Robert Sharenow (#2)

       The Berlin Boxing Club by Robert Sharenow shows how lots of propaganda can convince people to do terrible things.  During World War II, a young Jewish boy, with Aryan looks, who lives in Berlin, Germany learns to box.  Boxing was considered the superior sport of the 'true' German race.  The boy, Karl, got by with boxing for about 5 years, but when he faced his former nemesis in the junior championship tournament and started to beat him hard, someone tipped off the judges about his race.  He was disqualified from the tournament and his dreams were crushed.  He thought that if he could become a professional boxer that the Nazis might see how Jew aren't that bad.  This little anecdote shows how serious the Germans during WWII about segregating the Jews and Gypsies from the Aryans.  They wouldn't even let a German looking, Jewish boy fight an Aryan.  Adolf Hitler used propaganda to help convince people to get rid of the Jews and Gypsies.  He targeted the youth in a lot of ways that most people don't know about.  He started a club, Hitler Youth Club, that was a little like boy scouts.  The club gave its members swastika pins and belt buckles to wear to school to 'advertise'.  Karl wanted more than anything to be part of that club, but his father wouldn't hear of it.  Hitler also targeted parents because if parents had a certain political view, than their children would most likely share that political view.  Then kids would also share that same hatred toward the Jews at school.  They would torment the Jewish kids.  Karl's little sister who had more Jewish appearances got rotten apples and eggs thrown at her.  She was a little girl who felt unwanted and unloved.
        Germany was not proud of their getting rid of the Jews.  When they hosted the Olympics during that time period they replaced signs saying no Jews with signs advertising the Olympics.  They didn't want the rest of the world to know what was really going on.  They wanted to keep their dirty little secret.  I think what the Nazis did was sick but I also think that Hitler was a very smart man.  He knew that kids like stuff to show off.  How about make a pin to wear that will no only pressure Germans to join, but present the Jews and Gypsies nice and clear.  Signs are also necessary to help remind people what is right and what is wrong.  Everywhere people posted signs saying, "No Jew and No Gypsies."  The final step that Hitler executed was making the rules of society, laws.  It became the law that no Aryan could have a relationship with a Jew.  Jews were kicked out of their non-Jewish schools and lost all of their non-Jewish friends.  So now Aryans weren't just tormenting the Jews because of fear of public shunning, but now they were doing it because it was the law.  Hitler knew that propaganda brought people together.  People want something to be a part of.  They want to have friends that believe the same things they do and go to the same places that they do.  This is how Hitler convinced so many people to do such terrible things. Propaganda.

Reading Response to Berlin Boxing Club by Robert Sharenow

       Robert Sharenow displays the struggle to deal with diversity in The Berlin Boxing Club.  This book takes place in Berlin during World War ll.  The main character, Karl, is technically Jewish, but doesn't practice any religion.  Though the Germans responsible for killing or terrorizing the Jews did not care.  Some boys at his school found out that Karl had Jewish backgrounds and beat him up badly.  In the beginning Karl had tried to hide the fact that he was Jewish, this shows how scared he was of being different than the rest.  He didn't want to stand out because he had seen what would happen if he did, he saw how the couple other Jewish boys in his school were tormented every day.  Today diversity is a good thing, but back then in Berlin...not so much. 

       After a while, Karl was unfortunately discovered.  Three of the boys who beat up the Jews figured out Karl's background.  They caught him in a stairwell and started taunting him.  He was so scared.  The author did a great job describing this part.  I think a lot of people today understand that Jews were taken to camps and killed, but not many think about the everyday torment.  High school is hard enough, especially when you are different than everybody, but if a large political leader is killing Jews then the kids at school think why can't we?  They were for Hitler and they wanted him to like them so they bullied all the Jewish kids they knew, including Karl.  Karl was scared to go to school.  He felt like he had brought on shame to his family.  His father was a very poor artist who needed business very badly, but if people around the community found out he was Jewish, they would probably be to scared to visit his gallery.

       One time at one of Karl's father's showcases, Max Schmeling, a close friend of his dad, a very famous boxer attended.  When people asked Karl about bruises on his face, from the tormentors at school, Karl simply told them that he had fell down the stairs.  Though Max could tell that he had gotten punched to the face.  Max offered to give him private boxing lessons in exchange for a painting from his dad's gallery.  Karl excitedly agreed.  

      Diversity can be a bad thing or a good thing, depending on how people take it.  One thing is for sure, someone should not be afraid to be themselves.  This was hopefully a large lesson learned from WWII.  Great people like Max Schmeling take diversity and make it a good thing.  Karl thought he was different because he was a small, scared Jewish boy, but he doesn't understand at the moment that being different could also mean that you are a world renowned boxer who can fend for yourself.  Diversity is unavoidable, yet it is still a problem today.

Reading Response to So Much Closer

   So Much Closer by Susane Colasanti shows how unhappiness is a very common feeling when your family is broken up, especially when someone you love leaves your life.  Divorces are very common 'solutions' to marriage problems nowadays, but if you have a kid, do you truly realize how badly it affects them?  Their whole world has just been turned upside down and they are expected to just hit the ground running?  Brooke's mood took a turn for the worst when her parents separated, and he dad left them for another woman.  Though she found something else to focus on.  The love of her life, Scott Abrams.  As soon as Brooke worked up the courage to talk to him, he announced his moving to New York City. This didn't stop her though, she packed her bags and against her friends' better judgement, moved to Manhattan to live with her dad.  They 'coincidentally' ended up in the same neighborhood, and at the same school.  Brooke needs him to be happy again because she has had one too many traumatic, sad experiences for a girl her age.
         In the beginning of So Much Closer Brooke knew that her parents weren't happy together.  She heard them fighting, and even caught her dad cheating.  "I decided to sneak downstairs and see if mom looked mad.  Except I didn't find mom down there.  I found Dad.  And Justine, my babysitter, kissing.  I don't know if mom knew about it...People destroy your trust.  Then they leave."  Brooke was very unhappy with her father, who wouldn't be?  She couldn't believe that he did that to her mom.  She immediately lost trust in him.
          Towards the middle of the story, Brooke had gotten over her dad and accepted the fact that he was a terrible person, who cheated on her mom and left them.  She was unhappy and  angry with him and life in general.  Though she her love for Scott Abrams was stronger than her hate for her dad, so she moved to NYC to live with him, all to get closer to Scott.  This shows how Brooke's character isn't very intelligent or thoughtful.  She told her mom who had basically raised her on her own, that she wanted to leave her and go live with her dad who had done nothing but damage.  This must have broken Brooke's mom's heart.  Brooke didn't realize this though, and she moved anyways.  She left her friends and life behind.  But when Brooke went to school, and saw Scott, he didn't even recognize her.   Brooke realized her mistake.  "I shouldn't have moved.  This was a ginormous mistake.  I'm all alone.  I don't even know where anything is.  I'm a total outsider at school.  I don't know anyone.  Scott doesn't count.  He didn't even recognize me as first.  I'm obviously thinking about him way more than he's thinking about me..."
          Then in the end, Brooke realizes that just because Scott said a few words to her before he moved, doesn't mean he was in to her.  And that being around Scott at school wasn't worth leaving her mother and friends, and it isn't worth it living with her dad who is never around.  She has pushed people away that have tried to include her in things.  All she could focus on was Scott, but it seems as that was a mistake.  "And the girl sitting next to him.  Who is touching his shoulder.  He's with her.  They're together.  He's here with another girl."  Apparently Brooke's angry attitude is visible to other characters as well.  ""Yeah, Scott said you were like that." "Like what?  "You know. Angry."...Whatever.  So I'm angry.  You would be, too, if your dad left your mom for another woman." Now Brooke has nothing, no friends, no Scott, and no happily married parents.  Not all of these things are her fault, but if she had thought before she acted she would at least have some friends and her mom to rely on.
          I think that Brooke has a right to be depressed and angry.  But to fix this, she needs to move on.  Yeah her dad cheated, but that wasn't her fault and there is nothing she can do about it.  Moping around doesn't solve everything.  Also I think that she is a little reckless and crazy.  She really should have thought of the outcome before moving her life.  It never occurred to her that Scott might have another life, after living in NYC for the summer.  She really needs to think before she acts.  I think that this book, probably really touches some readers, who parents are divorced.  They can relate to what the character is going through, and see how she moves on and resolves her problems.  A divorce is a significant problem in our society today, and I think that is a very large reason for why Susane Colasanti wrote it.

Reading Response to Take Me There by Susane Colasanti

   The book, Take Me There, by Susane Colasanti shows that everyone experiences love in good ways and bad, but no matter how you encounter it, love is what unites us.  Though love can seem tricky or nonexistent, it has most likely been right in front of you all along.  Colasanti shows this by making Rhiannon, a main character, fall in love with her best friend James, and Nicole, another main character, fall in love with her boyfriend that she broke up with.  Love can also make you do crazy things such as abuse.  It can change who you are in good ways and bad ways as well.  Take Me There shows how the characters change throughout the story, and come to learn these lessons.
      In the beginning, Nicole, James, Danny, and Rhiannon are all pretty stubborn about there beliefs about love.  Nicole is sure that she loves her math teacher, Mr. Farrell, and that he loves her back.  For instance, "I can’t even remember ever having this much fun with Danny, just sitting around talking and laughing like there’s no one else you’d rather be with…Mr. Farrell says how he loves the energy here.”  She also believes that she is never going to talk about what happened during her childhood with her mom or anybody.  She does not want to get back together with Danny.  I think balancing all of these things is tough on her, she is trying to keep everything inside.   James is still in love with Rhiannon, his best friend, even though he won't admit it yet.  Danny has no doubt that he can get Nicole back, even though she dumped him.  Rhiannon is still hung up on her ex-boyfriend, Steve, who is now going out with Gloria, who bullies Rhiannon.  Nicole's friend Sheila is in love with her boyfriend, but he is abusing her.  For example, “I get that he’s hot and all, but what I don’t get is why she’s doing this to herself.  Like, how can they have anything in common? I mean, I know love makes you do crazy things, but this is ridiculous.  Sheila is the one person who’s totally put-together every day and super cheerful even early in the morning and always has her projects done like two days before they’re due, and know she just walked in looking like a truck ran her over.”  I think the author is trying to show what kind of crazy things love can make you do, and how overwhelming it can be.  Also Susane Colasanti might be trying to show how dangerous and sometimes even life threatening it can be.
      Towards, the middle of the story the characters seem a little more loose about their feelings and a little less stubborn.  The author is trying to show that although it's nice to love someone, and have them love you back, you need to be able to take control of your own life and make your own decisions.  It also seems like the characters are getting a little more trustworthy of each other.  When I was reading this book, I wondered, "What is Susane Colasanti trying to teach her readers about love?  Does she like it? Was she abused and that is why she showed two of her characters getting abused?"  I think Colasanti is all for love as long as you are careful with it.  People's feelings are very delicate.  I also think that she wants her readers to know how scary and common sexual abuse is.  It is a problem that can't always be avoided but can be stopped, as long as the victim speaks up.
      Then at the end of the story, all of the characters are open about their feelings.  They are not afraid to just go for it and live a little.  Rhiannon took revenge on Gloria.  She also kissed James and finally moved on from Steve.  Such as on page 207, "I sort of lean back into him.  Like I’m melting into him.  And in that instant, I finally know what it feels like to be whole.  I’ve been wishing for my life to get better.  Now I realize that James can take me to a place where everything’s the way it should be.  He can definitely take me there.  So when I turn around to face him, I don’t think about it at all.  I just kiss him.  And he kisses me back."  Nicole talks about her childhood and how her dad sexually abused her when she was a kid.  "There was this one night when she came home early.  From her bridge game.  And I heard her coming upstairs.  And then…that’s when he let my room.  So she saw him.  She saw him leaving my room…After she found out…that’s when we moved here…That’s why the got divorced.  My dad abused me.”  Nicole figured out how reality would never let her and Mr. Farrell be together, and she gave Danny a second chance.  Sheila moved out of her abusive boyfriend's house and got her life back together.  The story resolved perfectly, which in my opinion is a little unrealistic especially when involving love, but Susane Colasanti did a great job.  There were a lot of perspectives along with problems in this book, and I truly loved reading it.